Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare three methods of localizing the source of epileptiform activity recorded with magnetoencephalography: equivalent current dipole, minimum current estimate, and dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM), and to evaluate the solutions by comparison with clinical symptoms and other electrophysiological and neuroradiological findings.
METHODS: Fourteen children of 3 to 15 years were studied. Magnetoencephalography was collected with a whole-head 204-channel helmet-shaped sensor array. We calculated equivalent current dipoles and made minimum current estimate and dSPM movies to estimate the cortical distribution of interictal epileptiform discharges in these patients.
RESULTS: The results for four patients with localization-related epilepsy and one patient with Landau-Kleffner Syndrome were consistent among all the three analysis methods. In the rest of the patients, minimum current estimate and dSPM suggested multifocal or widespread activity; in these patients, the equivalent current dipole results were so scattered that interpretation of the results was not possible. For 9 patients with localization-related epilepsy and generalized epilepsy, the epileptiform discharges were wide spread or only slow waves, but dSPM suggested a possible propagation path of the interictal epileptiform discharges.
CONCLUSION: Minimum current estimate and dSPM could identify the propagation of epileptiform activity with high temporal resolution. The results of dSPM were more stable because the solutions were less sensitive to background brain activity.