Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Often peptides used in synthesis of radiopharmaceutical PET tracers are lipophilic and adhere to the walls of container closure systems (CCS) such that costly peptide and product are not fully recoverable after synthesis occurs. This investigation compares a standard United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Type I borosilicate glass CCS to a cyclic polyolefin copolymer Crystal Zenith(®) (CZ) CCS, for (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-DOTATOC ([(68)Ga] Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide) retention in the reaction vial after labeling.
METHODS: (68)Gallium labeling of DOTATOC was conducted by adding (68)Ga-chloride, 2M HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid) or 0.75 M sodium acetate, and 1-30 µg of DOTATOC into the CZ or glass CCS. The reaction mixture was heated for 15 min and cooled to room temperature. The crude reaction mixture was then withdrawn via syringe, for final processing. The CCS was then assayed using a dose calibrator to determine the amount of retained (68)Ga-DOTATOC. Statistical significance was assessed using an unpaired Student's t-test.
RESULTS: In all experiments (n=72) with various amounts of peptide and different buffering systems, the CZ CCS retained less activity than the glass CCS. Using 2 M HEPES and 15 µg or 30 µg of DOTATOC, the CZ CCS retained approximately 10% less of the labeled DOTATOC compared to the glass CCS (p CONCLUSION: For applications involving the labeling of peptides such as (68)Ga-DOTATOC, the CZ CCS compared to the glass CCS, results in an improved recovery of product.